Let Haskell level functions take responsibility of evaluation
We've discussed how a Haskell level function that operates on Plutarch level terms needs to be careful about work duplication. Related to this point, it's good practice to design your Haskell level functions so that it takes responsibility for evaluation.
The user of your Haskell level function doesn't know how many times it uses the argument it has been passed! If it uses the
argument multiple times without plet
ing it - there's duplicate work! There are two solutions here:
- The user
plet
s the argument before passing it to the Haskell level function. - The Haskell level function takes responsibility of its argument and
plet
s it itself.
The former is problematic since it's based on assumption. What if the Haskell level function is a good rule follower, and correctly plet
s its argument if using it multiple times? Well, then there's a redundant plet
(though back-to-back plet
s will be optimized away into one).
Instead, try to offload the responsibility for evaluation to the Haskell level function - so that it only plet
s when it needs to.